atreic: (Earth)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] atreic at 10:19am on 06/06/2012 under
This is starting to happen a bit more, so I thought it might be useful to jot down a FAQ. On the other hand, I tend to be a bit conflicted, so this FAQ might not make a lot of sense.



What does Sally like about calling ceilidhs?

- I like lots of people having fun dancing, and the smug feeling I made that happen

- I like being the centre of attention, and compliments afterwards ;-)

- I really really like ceilidhs, so I like being someone who makes more ceilidhs happen, in a 'pass it on' kind of way.

- Calling is good fun, I like doing it. I like thinking about the ability of the dancers, and the mood, and how tired they are, and the band, and trying to pick cute and unusual dances.

What doesn't Sally like about calling ceilidhs?

- I don't like too much pressure. I've gently steered away from wedding ceilidhs because of the fear around 'this is the Most Important Event of My Life and you called it badly'

- I don't like not being able to dance. I like dancing much more than I like calling, if I end up calling all the time I do less dancing.

- I don't like not being able to spend time with my friends. If it's a party or event that i would otherwise be invited to, spending the whole evening calling is different to dancing most dances and hanging around and chatting a bit.

- I don't like stressing about money. By which I mean, I've entirely lived on pay as you earn tax and not worrying. I'm very pro-tax, so I don't think I'd be comfortable just taking money for calling in cash and not paying tax on it. But I'm very anti-faff, so I really don't want to have to start doing Accounts, and Tax Returns, just because I called three ceilidhs in a year and earnt about 100 quid. I don't know what the law is about things like 'give money to charity and I'll do this' or 'just pay my travel expenses and give me a bottle of wine', but it feels slightly against my pro-tax stance? On the other hand, I believe in things like unions, and a fair wage for fair work, and don't want to be accidently undercutting all the hard working callers who need to be paid to survive.

- I don't like causing faff, if a band usually comes with a caller. If you're booking a band that have a regular caller they usually work with, I would much rather you used them than broke up a regular thing to use me.

- I'm not sure how good I am yet. I have done a lot of calling for clever Cambridge types who do a lot of folk dance. I haven't done a lot of calling for people who don't do a lot of dancing. This is a skill I want to build up, but it's something that makes me a bit nervous. Hence the mostly-avoiding wedding ceilidhs thing.

- I don't have any PA yet. You may find out it is nearly as expensive and faffy just to hire a microphone and speakers as it is to hire a caller with their own PA. I really should try and get some (hmm, it's my 30th soon, maybe that would be a sensible thing to ask for... I want a microphone you can walk about with - maybe even a crazy head mic so you can dance! - and just a speaker to make it loud... but I don't know much about PA)

So, will Sally call your ceilidh?

- If she isn't busy already, and is expecting to be vaguely in the right place at the right time, the answer is almost certainly yes. But...

- she doesn't have any PA, and would like at least a microphone.

- she likes dancing and being sociable, and would be happier to call only half a ceilidh

- she is only an amateur, and while she calls quite good ceilidhs this isn't her day job. If everyone ends up out of time with the music and each other, err, she's still learning.
There are 32 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] cartesiandaemon.livejournal.com at 09:36am on 06/06/2012
*hugs* Ooh, FAQ :)

FWIW, from what I remember, I think you were very good at being clear (including understanding what people who've been dancing for <50 years may need defined occasionally) for comparative beginners, funny and non-pushy, but I obviously can't speak for how good you are at choosing dances, not making mistakes, etc :)

I don't think I'd be comfortable just taking money for calling in cash and not paying tax on it.

I really should know the answer to this question. In fact, I hate paperwork and am really awful at being organised, so I've no idea. But I thought there was in fact some lower bound on what you pay tax on specifically so that if you get £100 for a one-off thing you don't have to fill in a whole pile of forms? But surely someone here knows, lots of people do freelance stuff (music, programming, etc) -- it seems worth finding out so you don't have to worry about it, because it's bound to come up in our lives occasionally.

(FWIW my assumption is that you can be reimbursed for expenses and that doesn't count as being paid, but gifts DO count at their market value, but as I say, there may be exceptions where you don't have to count them. But obviously, you shouldn't listen to random guesses, you should wait for someone who actually knows :))
 
posted by [identity profile] atreic.livejournal.com at 09:48am on 06/06/2012
Yes, one of the things I hoped might happen if I made this post would be that someone who knows all about the money already might come and explain it to me. I know that travel expenses are tax exempt, because I had to find that out for work once.

[But clearly 'please give me a bottle of booze because I can't be bothered to work out how to pay tax' is a very mild version of 'please pay me in cash so I don't have to pay tax', and given I'm rich enough to be able to afford the principles I should try my best to have them...]

Thank you for the kind words about my calling!
 
posted by [identity profile] crazyscot.livejournal.com at 10:23am on 06/06/2012
HMRC allow you to declare casual or freelance income without treating it as a full self-employed business. There are boxes on the tax return form to declare the total such income, allowable expenses, and any tax already paid there (as well as wanting a description of how you earned it).

There are some fairly strict rules surrounding what expenses are claimable. Travel expenses are usually OK, as long as it was money you spent solely to allow you to earn the income and not for other purposes (e.g. visiting a friend - that's a well known loophole, now closed). Boxes 16 through 20 on the main tax return form SA100 refer, along with the attendant guides on filling it in. It is imperative that you keep documentary evidence of your expenses in case you are audited (e.g. receipts for train tickets, journey/mileage log if you drive); you'll need to hang on to these for up to 7 years.

I suspect that if your earnings are more than a small amount (I know not what this mystical threshold might be) they'd want you to declare them as self-employment income, but in a sense that'd be a nice problem to have.

In the first instance you should either write to or ring HMRC to tell them you have received freelance income that is not fully taxed at source in a particular tax year. (You can do this as soon as you've earned the income.) They will probably respond with a form letter telling you they are going to start sending you tax returns. They may also want to know in advance how much you think you will earn this way, so that they can start assessing you for provisional tax; if so, that's tax paid up front which works itself out after the end of each tax year when you send in the return.
 
posted by [identity profile] atreic.livejournal.com at 10:40am on 06/06/2012
You see, this comment entirely convinces me I should not take money for calling.
 
posted by [identity profile] robert-jones.livejournal.com at 11:18am on 06/06/2012
It really isn't that hard. I used to do it with money I made from playing the organ: you just fill in a box saying you made £X from casual income, and put a note to say that it is from occasionally calling ceilidhs. I would just not claim any expenses: the worst that will happen is that you'll pay more tax than you need to.
 
posted by [identity profile] atreic.livejournal.com at 11:45am on 06/06/2012
Surely I could avoid the expenses question by, eg, if I was paid 50 quid to call a ceilidh and also given 41.23 for the cost of my train ticket, just putting 50 quid in the box? Or would that be Bad for some reason?
 
posted by [identity profile] robert-jones.livejournal.com at 03:03pm on 06/06/2012
Well, yes, it would be a fraud. The correct position is that you have informal income of 91.23, with associated expenses of 41.23. You're not under any obligation to declare the expenses, but you are obliged to declare the full amount of the income.
 
posted by [identity profile] atreic.livejournal.com at 03:09pm on 06/06/2012
If someone gives me 30 quid as a wedding present, is that informal income? I have hazy ideas that if it's a Huge Gift, and they die within n years, then it's a problem and I have to declare it. But that generally people can just give me money as a present and that's OK?

They really ought to teach this kind of thing in schools...
 
posted by [identity profile] robert-jones.livejournal.com at 03:13pm on 06/06/2012
Gifts are non-taxable. You are right that if the gift is over a certain threshold (£1000 for wedding presents and £250 otherwise), and the donor dies within 7 years, inheritance tax could potentially be due.
Edited Date: 2012-07-26 07:30 pm (UTC)
toothycat: (sunkitten)
posted by [personal profile] toothycat at 05:42pm on 06/06/2012
When I asked the tax people if I should be paying tax on the comics I sell, they asked me about my profit, which (when expense of attendng events, paying for tables and comics etc) was negligible to negative. Then they said I didn't need to bother. So it might be worth just phoning and asking them.

Sadly, I also do workshops for which I invoice people, and that does require me to declare self employed. Even though I still make a loss overall...
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
posted by [personal profile] simont at 11:02am on 06/06/2012
HMRC allow you to declare casual or freelance income without treating it as a full self-employed business. There are boxes on the tax return form to declare the total such income, allowable expenses, and any tax already paid there (as well as wanting a description of how you earned it).

That's interesting. When this happened to me a few years ago I found various boxes on the tax return that looked possibly like what you're describing here, but none of them seemed to be clearly applicable based on the detailed wording, so I gave up and phoned HMRC's helpline. I described the facts of the case and asked how I should translate them into tax-return-boxes, and they told me I should do a full-on self-employment page, so I did that (and – possibly as a result? – paid NI as well as income tax on the money).

Perhaps they told me that because the money in question was a little more than we're discussing here. (I can't remember whether I actually told them how much it was when I rang the helpline. If I didn't, then perhaps they told me that because it was the safe option if the amount was uncertain...) But if there is a box I could have used legally with less hassle, then I'm faintly annoyed that I didn't manage to find that out and do it!
 
posted by [identity profile] crazyscot.livejournal.com at 07:51pm on 06/06/2012
The forms and associated wording do, of course, change over time. The position for NI for the self-employed (as of maybe 2-3 years ago when I last looked into it) is that you can be exempt if your self-employed earnings are less than a certain threshold (conveniently nearly-aligned with the personal tax allowance).
 
posted by [identity profile] vinaigrettegirl.livejournal.com at 09:47am on 06/06/2012
i am not anti-tax; but a couple of hundred quid a year is unlikely to push you into a different tax band. You could offset your calling income by commensurate donations to a charity of your choice. Medical stats are important to several decimal places where the data are robust enough to support that level of analysis. Tax, not so much. We're in a system where, as Dr D has observed, the Chancellor has just finagled an unpaid-for tax cut for the wealthiest, Vodaphone gets away with non-payment of many millions in tax, as have numerous other large corporations, and taxes have effectively increased for the poorer members of society. Even if you quadrupled your calling income it would cost more for everyone to process your income tax than the actual revenue it generated.

Everything else on your excellent list looks totally reasonable for everyone to know and take on board. I admire your honesty.

 
posted by [identity profile] atreic.livejournal.com at 09:51am on 06/06/2012
It's a personal squick thing. I'm not saying everyone else should hold themselves to my standards, but I really don't want to earn money and not pay tax on it that I ought to pay.

[Also, I think there is a Ginger Biscuit risk as well, if you work for the public sector, and get seen doing something technically naughty it can have big career impacts. It's not my personal call that the government shouldn't care about my calling because it's not cost effective, it's the governments.]
 
posted by [identity profile] vinaigrettegirl.livejournal.com at 10:09am on 06/06/2012
Nor I: you should pay your taxes, of course. I merely raise the question of accounting as a factor in that: if you pay tax on an extra 100 pounds of income, pay an extra 100 pounds to charity and rightfully claim that back on your tax, I can see that as a virtue, yes, in terms of Ginger Biscuits and transparency. In your shoes I would bypass myself, channel that money straight from dancers to charitable donation land and keep it out of my hands entirely, but I am deeply paperwork-averse.
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
posted by [personal profile] simont at 10:57am on 06/06/2012
A quick google fails to inform me and I am avid to know: what do ginger biscuits have to do with untaxed income and/or the public sector?
 
posted by [identity profile] atreic.livejournal.com at 11:01am on 06/06/2012
MPs expenses, the 69p packet of Ginger Crinkle biscuits made headlines for a while...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5319360/Austin-Mitchells-letter-to-the-Telegraph-on-MPs-expenses.html
Edited Date: 2012-06-06 11:04 am (UTC)
gerald_duck: (frontal)
posted by [personal profile] gerald_duck at 10:28am on 06/06/2012
So far as I'm aware, having someone donate money to charity in exchange for your doing a thing is completely legal. It's also equivalent to their paying you, your paying income tax and then your donating money to charity with Gift Aid. Provided you donate more to charity each year than you earn from ceilidhs. (-8

Crazy head mics are cool gadgets. If you get one it might have pose value when giving presentations, too!
 
posted by [identity profile] atreic.livejournal.com at 10:41am on 06/06/2012
Yes, but remember, I'm the crazy anti-gift-aid person...
gerald_duck: (by Redderz)
posted by [personal profile] gerald_duck at 10:59am on 06/06/2012
Ah. Yes. /-8

You couldn't take the stance that in this case the government as made it both legal not to pay that tax and impractical to pay it, so it's their loss?
 
posted by [identity profile] atreic.livejournal.com at 11:06am on 06/06/2012
I must admit, charitable donations in exchange for calling does seem like the best of all possible worlds (I mean, obviously I'll do small ceilidhs or ceilidhs for close friends for free!) but it is a bit annoying that there isn't a better way. Some sort of website where you type in your NI number, type in the amount you got paid, and get given an amount and a reference which you can then immediately pay as a bank transfer to the Government, who do all the hard work keeping track of things, should be entirely achievable with current levels of technology...
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
posted by [personal profile] lnr at 12:09pm on 06/06/2012
It may comfort you to know I had conversation with my mum the other day, and she's an anti-gift-aid person too. I'm feeling a bit that way about it too - though not yet enough to refuse to do it. I may have a think about it.
chess: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] chess at 10:32am on 06/06/2012
Having had a quick look around the interwebs, it looks like the 'accept small amounts of money for stuff on top of your day job' situation is quite awkward for tax - you have to register as a sole trader with HMRC and get a self-assessment tax form (and also fill out another form to state that your self-employment income is small enough that you don't have to pay self-employment NI contributions on top of your standard employment ones).
toothycat: (sunkitten)
posted by [personal profile] toothycat at 05:47pm on 06/06/2012
You do have to do all that (well, I don't know about registering as a sole trader - I didn't, I just registered as self-employed, is that what you meant?) but it's not all that horrific to do. Mostly. About two days of paperwork pain, I think. I did get caught out by the NI thing, but I have recently smugly sent them my profit and loss pages from 2010-2012, which show a consistent loss, so ha.

FWIW, the limit on not paying extra NI is about £5000 from your self-employment.
 
posted by [identity profile] ghoti.livejournal.com at 03:18pm on 06/06/2012
I'd forgotten about PA, thankyou. Also, I was assuming that you like dancing and therefore if I'm having an informal bring and play ceilidh that I ought to be sure I have at least two people who want to call, so that both/all can dance as well.
 
posted by [identity profile] atreic.livejournal.com at 04:05pm on 06/06/2012
I have done 60 minute mini-ceilidhs for about 20 friends very happilly without PA (although sometimes I have slightly less voice the next day than would be ideal). But anything much bigger and it is a really really useful thing. Also, if you have a very unbalenced band (particularly if you have pretty but quiet instruments like flutes or recorders) you might want PA for the band, but again, it depends on how big / formal the event is.
 
posted by [identity profile] pete stevens at 04:07pm on 06/06/2012
We'll the 'serve 'em right' response would be to appropriately set up all the bits of paper you need to in order to legally pay the tax via a proper accountant and then subsequently discover that for legal reasons you're actually a boat docked in luxembourg that's now exempt from tax like real rich people are.

It may well be illegal for the ceilidh to pay you at all if they aren't registered for PAYE unless you send them an appropriate invoice to make the whole thing traceable.

An interesting question is, 'I gave my neighbour a bottle of wine I brought back from my holiday in France to thank her for looking after my cat over the weekend. Assuming we do no further documentation, how many and which laws did we break?'.
 
posted by [identity profile] kerrypolka.livejournal.com at 06:02am on 07/06/2012
I don't think it would serve 'em right, whoever 'em are.
 
posted by [identity profile] aiwendel.livejournal.com at 07:09pm on 06/06/2012
hmm...
The tax question is interesting.
My gut response is, it's an insignificant amount of money per year.

But then I am with you on the pro tax thing. And I do stuff like buy my petrol and packet of sweets on separate cards so the fuel goes on my trade account and the food on personal, routinely, even though it's a pain. Having said that once a year or so I can't be bothered, but that's about £2.50, and at least not a routine error for accountants to be annoyed at. Everything else goes through my accounts, but given I have the tax return nightmare anyway it isn't any more effort for it to.

If I were you I'd either take cash and give a portion to charity, assuming it's less than, say, £200 or so per year or less than £50/transaction. -ie not worth the effort of the accounts.

However given your worries about doing that I'd just ask the person to give to charity on your behalf and cover transport as a reasonably and easy solution.

I wouldn't feel bad about a gift/bottle etc if it's from a friend - see Pete's cat comment on that!!
 
posted by [identity profile] aiwendel.livejournal.com at 03:30pm on 07/06/2012
I feel morally obliged to add I do end up getting unaccounted for plants from work. Mostly because it's easier to buy one extra and definitely have enough for my client and not have to do another trip to the nursery for them (which would cost more in time and fuel than the plant that may or may not be spare); technically any spare plants go in a holding bed, where they can be dug up again and put in someone's garden, but they don't always get moved on, though in principle they could be in future, and they will (often) propagate rather than get 'used up'...
 
posted by [identity profile] half-of-monty.livejournal.com at 02:29pm on 07/06/2012
If you ever need a co-caller somewhere vaguely-reachable from Oxford, let me know!

I am probably substantially less good than you, with probabably a much more slap-dash attitude to getting it right, and a smaller repertoire. But I'm okay.

Entirely with you on the mic. Have you ever tried to call a ceilidh for about drunk 60 light entertainers without a mic, and with musical accompaniment consisting of a improvised band of kitchen appliances? [The amp broke]. Bellowing abuse shuts people up, so you can get on with the calling. But that technique is probably less appropriate in other contexts.
 
posted by [identity profile] mostlyacat.livejournal.com at 10:28am on 09/06/2012
Ah, so nuggish and good. :-)

Hugs lovely Sally
 
posted by [identity profile] cortez whittaker at 01:33pm on 03/03/2016
I totally agree with the all questions you raised. Thanks for the info, you made it easy to understand. I've forgotten the last time I filled out a form on paper. I mostly use PDFfiller to edit. You can easily fill UK Form SA100 here http://goo.gl/Ms4ebj

May

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
  1
 
2 3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31