Things I like that I may have to decide are bad...
This article claims the sleeper train is subsidised by £17,000 per departure. This is a ludicrous sum of money. [I did a quick google, and can't actually find out where they got the figure from]. As far as I can tell, the sleeper is already generally more expensive than flying, and is mostly used by people wanting to go on holiday, visit family, or commuting for work. These are all things I don't disapprove of, but I'm not sure they're worth 17,000 per train.
In other news, the RSPB are running this strange campaign. It turns out there is the Landfill Communities Fund, where landfill companies give money to Good Environmental Charities, like the RSPB, and get 90% of it back as tax relief. Obviously, this results in landfill companies losing out to the tune of 10%, so there is a clause that an independent 3rd party can make up the 10% they've lost, presumably to encourage landfill companies to do this 'good thing'. So the RSPB are encouraging people to donate money to the Nature Trust (Sandy). This is a charity that is, in the words of the RSPB, "an independent charity set up to help unlock money from the Landfill Communities Fund for RSPB conservation projects". Sigh. I'm sure most of you know that I don't like gift aid and other tax-back schemes at the best of times, but this just feels like the ikkiest sort of playing the system...
In other news, the RSPB are running this strange campaign. It turns out there is the Landfill Communities Fund, where landfill companies give money to Good Environmental Charities, like the RSPB, and get 90% of it back as tax relief. Obviously, this results in landfill companies losing out to the tune of 10%, so there is a clause that an independent 3rd party can make up the 10% they've lost, presumably to encourage landfill companies to do this 'good thing'. So the RSPB are encouraging people to donate money to the Nature Trust (Sandy). This is a charity that is, in the words of the RSPB, "an independent charity set up to help unlock money from the Landfill Communities Fund for RSPB conservation projects". Sigh. I'm sure most of you know that I don't like gift aid and other tax-back schemes at the best of times, but this just feels like the ikkiest sort of playing the system...
no subject
If the train load factor is 80%, then that's about 65 quid subsidy per traveller. Most of whom will have paid at least similar amount themselves, at a guess, given the yield management of cheap fares.
Now if Transport Scotland take the sleeper to be both a driver of tourism and also handy for businessmen, they might argue that it justifies the cost. Rural railway lines feature similar rates of subsidy to ticket cost, even if the 'cost per departure' is less eye-watering; those trains, however, are much smaller. And there, the subsidy is justified by the service connecting small, remote communities (say, Achnasheen) with regional centres (say, Inverness). Scale up the sizes of the two communities being compared (Aviemore and London) and I think the rationale is fairly solid.
Life would, of course, be much simpler if we could just run sleeper trains through the Channel Tunnel (like we were promised...). Then Edinburgh-Paris would make an attractive journey.
no subject
D
no subject
no subject
As for buses, a double-decker does about 4.5mpg, based on plucking a number from Google. So your average bus needs to have eight to ten passengers to beat a single-occupant car doing about 40mpg on the same route (the bus driver doesn't count). At peak times this is easily achieved, but how many buses are travelling off-peak with less than that number? They're stopping and starting a lot, too. Add the overheads again, driver wages, maintenance staff, bus garage, etc.
ETA: There's a reference in Hansard that claims the average number of passengers per bus is 9, for what that's worth.
D
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
If one went flat out for economy to the exclusion of all other considerations, motoring could probably approach 10p/mile. And the seats would still be more comfortable than the ones on trains!
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Making the wild assumption that this represents the unsubsidised cost of highway provision, it rather alters the equation ...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
The majority (?) of rail users are, I guess, commuters who don't have the luxury of advance booking, though.
Of course, if I'm going the same way as my sister, I'll travel with her anyway, for the company :)
My dad always travelled first class if he was working on the train.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I'm very impressed at a total running cost of under 20p per mile. What are you including in running cost?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
So no road maintenance by local or central government, then?
no subject
Do you have a source for that?
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Why do you not like gift aid etc.? And what part of what you have explained above seems ikky? I don't understand.
no subject
Given that gift aid has been around for about 10 years without a crackdown I think the party (Labour?) that introduced it were happily not thinking the same way.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
How do you feel about consumption taxes? I tend to view rebates such as Gift Aid as, in effect, a negative consumption tax on donating to charity.
no subject
Philosophy of government subsidy
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/863ec066-153a-11e1-855a-00144feabdc0.html
Ultimately, I think that if governments pass bloody stupid legislation with unintended consequences, it's not unethical to play the system. If honest people play the system openly, the government can adjust it to get rid of the worst unintended consequences. People who were playing the system then have to stop and not complain.
The trouble with opposing *any* subsidy (the roughly GBP 200m/year already committed to rich people's UK solar investments, or the GBP 17,000 per sleeper train) is that people always find worse wastes of money to compare it with.
Сам себе Новый Год
предпраздничном конкурсе "Что такое Новый Год?" :) Придумайте
рассказ, отправьте фотографию, придумайте
видео с Вами или с Вашими домашними на тему "Что такое Новый Год" и выиграйте полезные
призы от компании по производству фильтров для воды "Барьер". Подробности конкруса
здесь -http://goo.gl/7tMZ7